![]() This was a direct eyewitness, going on the record about his own experience with the Bidens, and the media only scoffed.Īt the time, all the usual suspects, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, MSNBC and CNN, went into overdrive to discredit the New York Post and parrot the bogus claim that it was all “Russian disinformation.”ĬNN’s Brian Stelter, supposedly a media critic, last week couldn’t find time to amend or correct his own previous reporting - or that of his network’s - that the laptop was a Russian plant. We laid out the facts as revealed by the emails and implored the media to do their jobs in reporting on them.īefore the final debate of the race, the Trump campaign produced Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter’s, who said he sat with President Biden as they discussed a deal with a Chinese energy company. I served as the communications director for former President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign throughout 20, so I was intimately involved in the battle over the coverage of Hunter’s laptop.įor the final two weeks of the campaign, we held daily press conference calls, usually featuring members of the Senate or House of Representatives. A few days into the drama, Politico published a letter from more than 50 “former intelligence officials,” who asserted that the laptop appeared to be a “Russian disinformation operation.” In the letter, the group actually admitted that “we do not know” if the emails were “genuine or not” and that “we do not have evidence of Russian involvement.”īut that enormous caveat did not stop them from signing their names anyway, and it certainly didn’t stop the media from latching onto the letter as a shield to protect them from reporting on the story honestly. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |